Someone Is Wrong on the Internet: Civil War is a Bad Captain America Movie 2 comments

“Whoa, whoa, whoa,” you might be thinking. “Mr. BFS, you think Captain America: Civil War, is a bad movie? The movie that has better critic and user reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB than the Captain America movies that came before it? Is the air a little too thin where a tall person like you walks?”

No, it’s not too thin, I get plenty of oxygen, and I’d especially like you to note the title. Civil War is a bad Captain America movie. It loses track of the person it’s supposedly about (even the movie poster does it: “Civil War” is larger than “Captain America,” you have to squint to see his name in red over there), and it’s more overstuffed than me trying to fit into the jeans I could wear in college.

So let’s do this someone is wrong on the internet thing. Now, don’t get me wrong, there are good things about Civil War. It has some powerful themes and ideas it’s working with, like revenge, individuality, morality, heroism, and what all those look like when society and politics have their say. Especially notable are the villain (if there is only one), who is not your typical, mustache-twirling type, and the Black Panther’s personal story arc, which moves palpably from grief to anger to vengeance to acceptance, no matter how familiar that arc might be.

If the movie focused on the problems and ideas it brings up, I would be more in agreement with the critics that have it hovering at 90% on Rotten Tomatoes. Because genre and comic books aren’t just for kids, nor are they only capable of being shallow, momentary bits of fun: they have the capability to deal with tough issues in an intriguing, memorable way that is different than stories that hew more closely to the realism of our everyday world.

Get your own movie, Spidey….

The problem is that Civil War doesn’t have focus. Can you follow its plot from A to B without confusion? Sure. But there are so many unnecessary detours and characters along the way. The most noticeable culprit is the inclusion of Spider-man, who’s basically there to help get people to attend Civil War (thanks to his appearing in the trailer) and to drum up interest in his own movie which has just hit theaters now, a year later.

Even if this were an Avengers movie (which I’m going to note again that it’s not), Peter Parker’s presence does nothing for this movie’s storyline. We have an extended detour to introduce him (5-10 minutes or so? longer? quite a bit in movie terms) and then he gets to hang out in a huge fight scene before departing, doing nothing to further the movie’s plot or themes. I love Spider-man, he’s a favorite of mine since I was young (and I loved the first two Tobey Maguire movies), but his inclusion here is badly handled and not needed.

If you still need convincing, contrast Spider-man’s role in the movie with Black Panther’s. You can’t take out the latter’s character without the movie weakening substantially, both in its plot and emotional resonance. Spidey can be taken out with nary a hiccup, and his hijinks in the airport fight could be easily accomplished by one of the MANY other characters there (and let’s face it, giant Ant-Man stole the show on that one).

But I keep coming back to the title of this review/post. This movie is an outright disservice to Captain America, one of the most interesting characters of the Marvel Cinematic Universe. From the moment I saw the trailer for Cap’s first movie and watched Steve Rogers fall on a grenade to save his fellow soldiers, I couldn’t help but love him. His first two movies really embrace who he is as a character and let him shine, whether he’s hucking his shield at Nazis, trying to engage Peggy Carter’s interest, or dealing with a whole host of personal, emotional, or moral issues.

We lose track of him in this movie. He’s so often an outside player whose motives we can’t completely grasp, from a shoehorned romantic moment to what had to have been some agonizing quandaries over the things his best friend, Bucky, has done in his brainwashed past. Compare that to his first movie, which is reviewed significantly lower than Civil War, but let’s us get to know the guy and what he’s thinking. We know why he turned out so differently from Red Skull after receiving the Super Soldier serum. We know why he’s frustrated when he isn’t allowed on the front lines, and we want him to make a difference just as much as he does. When he’s finally allowed to do his thing, there’s an emotional tension valve released for him and the audience. It’s a movie I want to watch more than once, and have.

Civil War? Saw it the once and don’t care to see it again. Even if I think about it more like an Avengers movie (which I definitely have tried to), I keep coming back to what a big, chaotic mess it is. No matter how interesting its themes and ideas are, it tried to do too much. As more than one good critic and artist has noted, just because you can do more (more CGI, more characters, more action, etc.) doesn’t mean you should.

2 thoughts on “Someone Is Wrong on the Internet: Civil War is a Bad Captain America Movie

  • Nicholas

    I agree with absolutely everything that you say here. The second Cap film is so good because it keeps the focus tight on him, with only a small, but integral supporting cast, and a story that fleshes out his character. It also cements his integrity and inherent goodness. Civil War not only marginalizes Cap as a character, but takes what we know to be true about him and trashes it. It takes his inherent goodness, honesty, and purity, and spits all over it. I am talking of course, of the way that Steve has been maliciously keeping the true identity of Tony’s parents’ killers from Tony to the degree that at the end, when the cat is out of the bag, he is still lying to Tony’s face about it. I get that he wants to protect Bucky, but Tony is his friend, as well, and from what we’ve been previously shown about Steve, he should have gone to Tony with the truth long before things got to this point. But then I guess you don’t get a huge fight at the end. I forget, though, that today’s filmmakers would rather have our greatest fictional heroes nonsensically fight each other than work together. In that way, Civil War is just a more competently made Batman v Superman. Ugh.

    • Neal Post author

      You are so right about that. I actually couldn’t believe that moment when we learn Cap has been lying: I was like, “He wouldn’t do that!” Now, it could certainly have been an added source of antagonism throughout the film if it was revealed earlier, with Cap still wanting to protect Buck because he was brainwashed when he killed them, but the lie was completely out of character. It’s an even bigger issue as it makes Cap throwing down his shield okay which is just… wrong. Even more wrong than Hella destroying Mjolnir in the Thor: Ragnarok trailer (even if everything else for that movie looks like it’s going to be a blast).

      There was so much I didn’t feel like I could cram into this blog, either. Like how Spidey was unneeded to make fans excited about Captain America 3, so he didn’t need to be in it or the trailer (and Spidey’s own trailer did a good enough job getting people excited for his own movie, so his showing up elsewhere wasn’t needed for that). Black Panther definitely needed introducing, as he is a lesser known character, but Spidey is ubiquitous. And yeah, Panther actually adds a lot to the story and needed to be there!

      Motivations for both Cap and Iron Man were just weird, too, as Cap generally wants to work with authorities. If they had built it off of the distrust created by the revelation of Hydra within SHIELD’s ranks, it could work, but they didn’t really try to set it up much, or show him as conflicted. Tony Stark wanting to work with the government and stuff was just… dumb. Iron Man 2 is all about how he didn’t want his armor being controlled by the government! That needed more time for him to pivot realistically (Gwenyth Paltrow not being around for that aspect takes a visceral chunk out of what could have hit the viewer and Tony quite hard) and points out yet again why this isn’t really a Captain America movie. It’s an Avengers or even Iron Man 4 before that. We’re really running into the same issues the comics have, where one series gets thrown off to let Marvel have some mega storyline going. 🙁

      I dunno. I still can’t get over how weird reviews are for this movie. They’re all praising it for exploring tricky issues, but it doesn’t really explore them much and has too much going on to really have any focus. I don’t think I’ve heard a critique of Spiderman being in the movie anywhere, and he so clearly doesn’t need to be there. But Marvel will pull the same shenanigans again, I’m sure, because reviewers encouraged it and fans were just excited to see a good film iteration of Peter Parker return. *shakes head*

Comments are closed.